|
Chapter 10 -
Vehicle replacement strategy
Let’s review a typical strategic vehicle replacement plan, focusing on the costs to own, operate and maintain a vehicle (excluding driver costs). On page 54 is a worksheet, Vehicle Replacement versus Repair Analysis, to help guide you through the cost collection and analysis section.
The key to identifying the optimum replacement cycle is determining the point at which combined fixed and repair costs start to increase. From the maintenance side, you must be able to identify year-to-year repair costs and miles operated on a per-unit basis. The following discussion provides information that will help you compare and contrast the cost of equipment at annual increments.
In the real world, life-cycle costs vary according to factors outside of your control, such as interest rates, fuel prices or a surge or plummet in used truck prices. These are real issues for your life-cycle costing, but to make our example easier to understand, we will assume stability in these “wild cards.” We also are assuming some predictability, based on available data, in the gradual increase in maintenance costs as a tractor ages. The following calculations assume:
- New $100,000 3-axle live tandem Class 8 tractor
- 5 percent interest amortized over five years
- 100,000 miles per year
- Average diesel price of $1.50 per gallon
- Average fuel economy of 8 miles per gallon
- Total maintenance costs increasing from 16 cents in year one to 20.2 cents in year seven (see detailed assumptions)
- Straight-line depreciation (see detailed assumptions)
- Resale value drops 30 percent in the first year and 20 percent of the purchase price each year thereafter.
- For all practical purposes, the vehicle operating cost is fuel; most other items (except driver costs) appear under maintenance.
Determining net costs
One point that might not be obvious when calculating net costs is that due to tax benefits, depreciation is a positive, not negative, factor for the first few years of a tractor’s life. We are assuming that this trucking company is making money; otherwise the tax benefits may be reduced or non-existent. Our scenario assumes a straight-line depreciation, but in reality you probably will see higher depreciation in early years. Notice that the cost per mile rises almost 5 cents in year four due to loss of that tax benefit.
Annual vehicle costs
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Principal/ Interest |
Maintenance cost |
Operating cost |
Total net cost |
Depreciation |
Net |
Cost per mile (cents) |
|
1 |
$25,000 |
$16,000 |
$18,750 |
$59,750 |
($5,100) |
$54,650 |
$4.7 |
2 |
24,000 |
16,700 |
18,750 |
59,450 |
(5,100) |
54,350 |
54.4 |
3 |
23,000 |
17,400 |
18,750 |
59,150 |
(5,100) |
54,050 |
54.1 |
4 |
22,000 |
18,100 |
18,750 |
58,850 |
0 |
58,850 |
58.9 |
5 |
21,000 |
18,800 |
18,750 |
58,550 |
0 |
58,550 |
58.6 |
6 |
0 |
19,500 |
18,750 |
38,250 |
0 |
38,250 |
38.3 |
7 |
0 |
20,200 |
18,750 |
38,950 |
0 |
38,950 |
39.0 |
Accounting for lost resale opportunity
The calculation doesn’t tell the whole story. By operating a tractor you are giving up money you could obtain by disposing of it. This lost resale opportunity is a real, though hidden, cost. The lost resale opportunity for any year is the difference between the purchase price ($100,000) and the resale value during that year. Assuming resale values decline at the rate outlined in our assumptions above, resale value and lost resale opportunity break down as shown in the chart below.
Resale value and lost resale opportunity
 |
|
|
|
Year |
Purchase price |
Resale |
Lost resale opportunity |
| |
1 |
$100,000 |
$70,000 |
$30,000 |
2 |
100,000 |
56,000 |
44,000 |
3 |
100,000 |
44,800 |
55,200 |
4 |
100,000 |
35,840 |
64,160 |
5 |
100,000 |
28,672 |
71,328 |
Equation: Adjusted net costs
The calculation of net costs adjusted for
lost resale opportunity isn’t simply the
sum of the total net cost and the lost
resale. The equation is:
| |
Current year’s net |
| |
+ Sum of all previous years’ net |
| |
+ Current lost resale opportunity |
| Adjusted net income = |
________________________________ |
| |
Number of years in fleet |
Net vehicle cost breakdown
This formula produces the following
breakdown which indicates that even
taking lost resale opportunity into account,
net vehicle costs drop steadily.
Net cost overview
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Total net cost |
Cost per mile (cents) |
Lost resale |
Adjusted net cost |
Cost per mile (cents) |
| |
1 |
$54,650 |
54.7 |
$30,000 |
$84,650 |
84.7 |
2 |
54,350 |
54.4 |
44,000 |
76,500 |
76.5 |
3 |
54,050 |
54.1 |
55,200 |
72,750 |
72.8 |
4 |
58,850 |
58.9 |
64.160 |
71,515 |
71.5 |
5 |
58,550 |
58.6 |
71,328 |
70,356 |
70.4 |
6 |
38,250 |
38.3 |
77,062 |
65,960 |
66.0 |
7 |
38,950 |
39.0 |
81,650 |
62,757 |
62.8 |
Detailed assumptions
To understand the numbers behind our
calculations on the previous pages, here is
the data behind the maintenance costs
and depreciation.
Maintenance cost per mile (cents)
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wages/benefits |
|
3.5 |
4.0 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
5.5 |
6.0 |
6.5 |
Tires/tubes |
|
1.5 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
Road costs/breakdowns |
|
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.6 |
Permits/miscellaneous |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Misc. taxes |
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
2.0 |
Insurance |
|
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
| |
Total |
|
16 |
16.7 |
17.4 |
18.1 |
18.8 |
19.5 |
20.2 |
Depreciation schedule
Assumptions
- Vehicle depreciates at 30 percent per year for three years
- The resale value at the end of year five is $49,000
- Total depreciation is $51,000 (purchase price minus resale value)
- Straight-line method
Year |
|
1 |
17,000 x 30% = $5,100 |
2 |
17,000 x 30% = $5,100 |
3 |
17,000 x 30% = $5,100 |
Fuel costs
100,000 miles per year = 12,500 gallons
8 miles per gallon
12,500 gallons x $1.50 per gallon = $18,750
The scenario outlined above suggests that you could expect a significant cost reduction after year five due to paying off the note. But your strategy shouldn’t necessarily depend on cost per mile alone. Keep in mind that fleet age affects other areas as well. As a unit gets older, repairs move from smaller, less complicated jobs to larger ones that require more advanced tooling, greater mechanical skill and more parts inventory.
Your utilization and reliability could also be seriously in doubt if your equipment becomes too old. And then there is the marketing aspect; prospects — and existing customers — may perceive older equipment as unreliable, even if it isn’t.
Don’t view any life-cycle costing as an isolated effort. Coordinate life-cycle costing with your company’s short-, medium- and long-term strategic plans. If your company gets larger, smaller or stays the same size, or if the mix and density of your equipment changes, your replacement strategy will change.
In Summary
For a typical over-the-road operation, total vehicle costs drop dramatically after the financing term because maintenance costs on older equipment typically rise gradually, unlike the dramatic drop in ownership costs once you pay off a tractor or trailer. But don’t base your replacement strategy on cost-per-mile alone; very old equipment is susceptible to
sudden and unexpected maintenance cost increases and may be too unreliable to maintain quality customer service.
Vehicle replacement vs. repair analysis
 |
|
|
|
| |
Old Vehicle |
New Vehicle |
|
|
1. Labor |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
2. Parts |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
3. Estimated mileage
next year |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
4. Fuel |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
5. Registration |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
| 6. Tax |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
| 7. Insurance |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
| 8. Principal |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
| 9. Interest |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
TOTAL COST |
________________________________ |
________________________________ |
| |
|
|
| |
Salvage value |
|
| |
Total cost of old ________________________________ |
Total cost of new ________________________________ |
|